Mielitz v. Mielitz
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
NICHOL, Chief Judge.
This diversity action arises from a family disagreement involving a sale of land. Plaintiffs allege the existence of oral agreements for the sale of the land in dispute. Defendants deny the existence of an agreement and, in addition, raise the statute of frauds as a defense. Defendants also counterclaim.
Plaintiffs seek specific performance and damages, or, in the alternative, solely damages. Defendants’ counterclaim prays 1) that the court order plaintiffs to relinquish possession of the land in dispute and 2) that the court order plaintiffs to pay the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Holste v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Burke v. FineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Tjanetopoulos v. MargaresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Guardianship of HuesmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984