Legal Opinion
Shipkovitz v. the Washington Post Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 19, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1053 (RCL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court comes four pending motions in this case: (1) defendants Mary Curtius and Louise DiMatteo’s (collectively, “Arlington Defendants”) motion [3] to dismiss or transfer venue; (2) plaintiffs motion [27] for reconsideration of the Court’s Order [26] dated January 9, 2008 and “for leave to supplement and second supplement to [plaintiffs response to Arlington Defendants’ motion to dismiss or transfer],” and “for extension of time to respond to Arlington Defendants’ motion”; (3) plaintiffs unopposed motion [32] for leave to file…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- George, Diane v. Leavitt, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jankovic v. International Crisis GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Stovell v. JamesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Von Kahl v. Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Chowdhury v. Hilton Hotels CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hargrave v. Washington PostDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009