Legal Opinion

Monastes v. Catlin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1876PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Columbia County. The facts are stated in tbe opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Watson, J.:

This action is brought by the appellant, David Monastes, guardian of the estate of Peggy McLane, a person of unsound mind, against John Catlin, the respondent, to recover the possession of a tract of land situated in Columbia county. It is admitted that before the guardian’s sale sought to be proven by defendant, Peggy McLane was the owner in her own right in fee-simple of the tract of land in dispute, and that unless the order of the county court for Columbia county, which we are about to examine, was valid and sufficient to constitute C. A. Bradbury her guardian,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Tustin v. GauntOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Johns v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1870
  4. State v. OfficerOregon Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Hillman v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Baker v. CuretonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Rutenic v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1902

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API