Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Holliday

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 2000No. CA 00-42PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton Roaf, Judge.

Elizabeth Hogan appeals from a circuit court order setting aside a jury verdict that found Hogan negligent in an automobile accident but awarded zero damages. Hogan argues that the circuit court abused its discretion in granting plaintiff/appellee Brenda Holliday a new trial. We affirm.

Hogan and Holliday were involved in a three-car accident in which Hogan rear-ended a truck driven by Randall Wagner, who then struck the rear of Holliday’s car. Hogan testified that she was going thirty-five miles per hour and reduced her speed only minimally before she struck Wagner.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nazarenko v. CTI Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Young v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Carr v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Eisner v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Thigpen v. PoliteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bruce v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Campbell v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Source Logistics, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. NA041790UCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Campbell v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API