Legal Opinion

Fant v. Miller

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1936No. 5239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiff alleged that he leased to defendant a certain tract of land in Rapides parish, La.> for farming purposes for an agreed money rent of $150, represented by a promissory note bearing interest at the rate of 8 per centum per annum from maturity until paid, and 10 per centum attorney’s fees on both principal and interest.

He further alleged that certain property upon which he had a lessor’s lien and privilege had been removed from the leased premises and disposed of, and prayed for a provisional seizure to issue, for judgment in the amount of the note, and for recognition of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. GeterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. RicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Sliman v. FishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Young v. GeterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Vento v. AmiciLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laurencic v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Matter of MmahatUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
  3. In Re McCollumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006
  4. Fant v. DevilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API