Legal Opinion

Sliman v. Fish

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 27, 1933No. 31921PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

The defendant, W. B.. Pish, was sued for $2,400 as the balance due under a contract of lease, and certain of his movable effects were provisionally seized in the enforcement of the lessor’s privilege. Defendant pleaded prematurity, no cause of action, exemption of the property seized, and that plaintiff violated the lease by taking charge of the leased premises, thereby depriving defendant of the use and occupancy thereof. The court below gave plaintiff judgment for the amount sued for less a credit of $31, and maintained the provisional seizure of all the property seized,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. RicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  3. Holden v. TannerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
  4. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. Louisiana Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  5. Prather v. BoboSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. GeterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Mounger v. FerrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Weil v. SeguraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Holt v. FlournoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Lirette v. SharpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API