Legal Opinion

Young v. Geter

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 6, 1936No. 33945PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

The Judges of the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit of Louisiana, availing themselves of the provisions of section 25 of article 7 of the Constitution of 1921, have submitted for our instructions three questions of law which arose in the above-entitled case, pending before them on appeal from the Tenth judicial district court in and for. the parish of Natchitoches.

The facts of the case, as certified to by the Court of Appeal, are in substance as follows: O. L. Young, who had leased his farm to the defendant, H. W. Geter, provisionally seized for the payment of his rent the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. RicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Sliman v. FishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  3. Vento v. AmiciLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mounger v. FerrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Holt v. FlournoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. WT Grant Company v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  4. Mickenheim v. CathcartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. In Re McCollumDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API