Legal Opinion

Arnaud v. Grigg

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill to foreclose. Motion for leave to amend answer.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill prays, among other things, for a decree for deficiency against David Mayer as to one-half of the complainant’s mortgage. His liability to such decree is based on his assumption and agreement contained in a deed from Esther Lichtenstein and her husband to him. The answer admits that by the deed he assumed and agreed to pay one-half of the mortgage, but denies his liability thereon to the complainant. It expressly pleads that the deed was, in fact, only a mortgage. In the progress of the testimony a deed of defeasance, executed by Mrs. Lichtenstein, then a widow, and Mr.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowen v. CrossNew York Court of Chancery · 1820

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howell v. BakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Mooney v. PetnickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API