Mooney v. Petnick
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This is a bill to foreclose. The only defense interposed is that of usury. The defendant Louis Petnick answers and says that he executed to the complainant a certain bond purporting on its face to secure the sum of $17,000, conditioned for the payment of that sum within five years from the date thereof, with interest at the rate of six per cent. per annum payable semi-annually, but denies that he was indebted to complainant in any such sum, and further says that the complainant only advanced the sum of $15,850, which was actually received by him as the consideration for said bond,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Borough of Vineland v. MarettiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
- Delaware Bay & Cape May Railroad v. MarkleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
- Taylor v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1872
- Arnaud v. GriggNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878
- Boehme v. RallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hinners v. BirkevaagNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Brown v. ComerAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1938