Cortez v. Custard
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LEMCY CORTEZ CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-3110 DEPUTY THOMAS CUSTARD ET AL SECTION “L” (1) ORDER & REASONS Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Examine the Capacity of Plaintiff to Sue Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17. R. Doc. 57. Plaintiff Lemcy Cortez opposes the motion. R. Doc. 58. Having considered the briefing, record, and applicable law, the Court rules as follows. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lemcy Cortez brings this
42 U.S.C. § 1983
case against Deputy Thomas Custard, Deputy Brittney Reese, Sheriff Joseph P.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neff v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Theresa M. Bodnar v. Catherine Bodnar, Margaret Bodnar, Individually and as Administratrix of Theestate of Mary H. Bodnar, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Scannavino v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- United States v. One Parcel of Property Located at 9607 Lee Road 72District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Wales v. MaromaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991