Legal Opinion

Wales v. Maroma

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1991No. Nos. CA 90 1337, CA 90 1338PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Judge.

Plaintiff, Mary Wales, as curator of the interdict, Pauline Maroma, brought separate actions seeking to have two judgments, which were rendered by default against Mrs. Maroma (prior to her interdiction), declared null, based on allegations that the judgments were rendered against Mrs. Maroma while she was mentally incompetent and unrepresented by an attorney. The two suits, which were consolidated for trial, seek annulments of a judgment for separation, dated May 5, 1983, and of a judgment for divorce, dated November 10, 1983. After the presentation of plaintiff’s case, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neff v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Silvio v. Pharoah's PalaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roebuck v. RoebuckLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Cortez v. CustardDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  3. Hamilton v. VannoyDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API