Davis v. Conn
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above.) The principal questions made on the appeal are founded on the several assignments of error, which may here be disposed of together, that challenge the conclusions of law made by the court that appellee was not owing appellants in damages for the value: (1) Of the trees cut and removed from the land; or (2) for the turpentine taken from the trees; or (3) for the rental value of the land during the time the trees were being turpentined. The questions made are predicated, of course, upon the established facts as found and considered by the trial court. • In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lodwick Lumber Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Carter v. Clark & Boice Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Montgomery County Development Co. v. Miller-Vidor Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Lancaster v. RothCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
3Cited by14 opinions
- Temple Lumber Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Griner v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- West Lumber Co. v. C. R. Cummings Export Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Coats v. WindhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Davis v. Haslam Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.