Temple Lumber Co. v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
In this cause appellees recovered against appellant the title to the timber upon the land described in their petition and $325 as damages for a small quantity of the timber wrongfully cut and removed. We have no statement of facts, but the trial court filed the following conclusions of fact and law in support of its judgment:
"Findings of Fact.
"1. Plaintiffs conveyed to W. F. Goodrich by deed dated July 30, 1920, the timber in controversy. It also stipulated in said deed that the grantee should have six (6) years from the date thereof within which to cut and remove said timber. It was further…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Johnson v. PortwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Ogden & Johnson v. BosseTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Rice v. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
- Howard v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. BoykinTexas Supreme Court · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jones v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Davis v. GaleTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Cox v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc. v. FenixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Krasa v. DerricoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.