Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. Peter Sean Cannon
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
APPEL, Justice.
In this disciplinary proceeding, an Iowa attorney is charged with plagiarism in connection with the filing of briefs in federal court. He is also accused of charging his client an unreasonable fee for the preparation of those briefs. The Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa found that the attorney committed plagiarism but did not charge an excessive fee. The commission nonetheless recommended a six-month suspension of the attorney’s license. The attorney has filed a statement urging a more lenient sanction. Upon our de novo review, we agree with the findings of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. LickissSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. IversenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. BernardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MulfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. KadengeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Peter Sean CannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kermit L. DunahooSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011