Legal Opinion

Roe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1940No. 21104Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

The State has filed a motion for rehearing relying on that part of Art. 1413 P. C., which is italicized by us. “The taking must be wrongful, so that if the property came into the possession of the person accused of theft by lawful means, the subsequent appropriation of it is not theft, but if the taking though originally lawful, was obtained by any false pretext, or with any intent to deprive the owner of the value thereof, and appropriate the property to the use and benefit of the person taking, and same is so appropriated, the offense of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Hoovel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Segal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Contreras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API