Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Burrows

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 7, 1988No. 86PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

We are challenged to consider the proper remedy when a criminal trial transcript is not available, through no fault of the defendant, and appellate defense counsel has refused to avail himself of the provisions of Rule of Appellate Procedure 1923, providing for an agreed upon statement of the record.

Appellate counsel argues that the case should be remanded for retrial on the basis that the trial transcript is unavailable and meaningful appellate review is impossible. The Commonwealth responds that the case should be remanded for preparation of a trial transcript or for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. StewardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. MichuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. HarveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API