Varco-Pruden, Inc. v. Hampshire Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiff appeals from summary judgment of the Monterey County Superior Court in favor of defendant.
Issues Presented
1) The pertinent contracts do not provide that plaintiff indemnify defendant for the expenditures in question.
2) Defendant’s declaration does not establish that plaintiff subsequently assumed liability for the cost of repairs.
3) Section 2509, subdivision (3), of the California Uniform Commercial Code is not applicable.
4) Varco-Pruden, Inc. is not entitled to attorney’s fees on this appeal.
Record
Plaintiff Varco-Pruden, Inc. (hereinafter “Vareo”) filed a complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Dream Theater, Inc. v. Dream TheaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Presley of Southern California v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Queen Villas Homeowners Ass'n v. TCB Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.