Legal Opinion

Mumm v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 9, 1950No. 16096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays

Defendants in error recovered judgment in the district court against plaintiffs in error upon a draft in the sum of $2279.50, under circumstances hereinafter stated. Reversal is sought by writ of error.

Jay Taylor and Edward B. Johnson, plaintiffs below, were the operators of a livestock auction sales ring in Amarillo, Texas, and Claus Mumm and Henry Adam, defendants, operated a similar sales ring at La Junta, Colorado, under the name of La Junta Auction Company. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that defendants, prior to June 17, 1946, entered into an agreement with one L. L. McDaniel to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mackey v. FullertonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  2. McBride v. NobleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Kingsbury & Co. v. Riverton-Wyoming Refining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Boyd v. Agricultural InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Jackson v. A.B.Z. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Weston Group, Inc. v. A.B. Hirschfeld Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Eckles v. Pan American Marketing (In Re Balducci Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  5. e at Seventeenth Avenue Owners Association v. NelsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API