Legal Opinion

Kingsbury & Co. v. Riverton-Wyoming Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1920No. 9697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. C. J. Morley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

Plaintiff in error brought suit against the defendant in error for an accounting, under a contract between the *582parties, by which the plaintiff undertook to sell the capital stock of said company in consideration of 40% of the' proceeds received from all stock sales. Plaintiff claimed that he was entitled to a credit equal to 40% of the value of certain lands, and other property, taken in exchange for stock.

For a second cause of action, he claimed a right to recover the amount of a check which he had given to the company for stock, which he had sold to one Carwin, which check the company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wisdom v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Gorham v. Massillon Iron & Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Valleyview Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Detroit, Hillsdale & Southwestern Railroad v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. HORTON-CAVEY REALTY COMPANY v. SpencerColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Mumm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  4. Kelso v. KelsoDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API