Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Agricultural Insurance
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1904No. 2380PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This was a suit upon a bond executed by Boyd, as principal, and the other plaintiffs in error as sureties.
One of the conditions of the bond is, that Boyd should at all times, upon the request of the company or its authorized agent, pay and deliver to said company all moneys, etc., belonging to said company.
I The breach assigned is, that during the months ' of July, 1898, to January, 1899, inclusive, Boyd, as such agent, received into his hands moneys for premiums, after allowing all credits, rebates and commissions, in the sum of $2,624.84, which he wholly failed and refused to remit or pay…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cronan v. CottingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Allen v. CulverNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Wolf v. StixSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Watertown Fire Insurance v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Johnson, Smathers & RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Mumm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Feltner v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933