Legal Opinion

Wica, Inc. v. Wwsw, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 19, 1951No. 10941_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant (plaintiff) sued for damages for breach of contract. A summons to answer was issued against each defendant corporation. At direction of plaintiff’s attorney the Marshal served the summons .against WWSW, Inc. “by serving Paul M. Segal.” Similarly, the summons against WEBR, Inc. was served upon Louis G. 'Caldwell. In each instance service was so ■directed upon the theory that the individual served was the agent of the corporation. The defendants, appearing specially, moved -to quash the service.

The following undisputed facts were -shown: Plaintiff and defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Granite State Provident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Thach v. Continental Travelers' Mutual Accident Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Shainwadd v. DavidsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1895
  4. Delta Ins. & Realty Agency v. Fourth Nat. Bank of MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madge Schultz v. Wayland SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. ZON. BD. OF ADJ. OF TP. OF SPARTA v. Service Elec. Cable Television of NJ, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  3. Brakke v. RudnickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Olympus Corp. v. Dealer Sales & Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  5. LOCAL 617, ETC. v. Hudson Bergen Trucking Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API