Legal Opinion

State v. Ernst

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1941No. 32,696PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Coring, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of a violation of L. 1939, c. 284, § 1, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1940 Supp. § 2684-9, requiring the filing of a surety company bond with the registrar of motor vehicles and the payment of a $5 fee for the general revenue fund before offering for sale or placing upon a used car lot for sale any used or secondhand motor vehicle brought into this state for the purpose of sale or resale. He attacks the constitutionality of the law with the contention that it violates the commerce clause of the constitution of the United States and the due process and equal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Minnesota v. BlasiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller Brewing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Tri-State Auto Auction, Inc. v. OstrootSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Village of Zumbrota v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Bouthillier v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. KimbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API