Legal Opinion

Textainer Equipment Management Limited v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 25, 2017No. 08-610CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (“URA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4654(c); RCFC 54(d)

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

NANCY B. FIRESTONE, Senior Judge

Pending before the court is plaintiff Capital Lease Limited’s (“Capital”) motion for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (“URA”), 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Biery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Textainer Equipment Management Limited v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Textainer Equipment Management Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Textainer Equipment Management Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API