Textainer Equipment Management Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case claim that the United States Army (“Army” or “government”) has taken their property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Pending before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
The plaintiffs, CAI International, Inc (“CAI”), Cronos Containers Limited (“Cro-nos”), and Textainer Equipment Management (U.S.) Limited (“Textainer”), the successor in interest to Capital Lease Limited (“Capital”), own and/or manage a large fleet of “intermodal” shipping containers.1…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Textainer Equipment Management Limited v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Gadsden Industrial Park, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.