Legal Opinion

Aulton Daniel Goben, III v. County of Kent et al.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 13, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01846Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ AULTON DANIEL GOBEN, III, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:25-cv-1846 v. Honorable Maarten Vermaat COUNTY OF KENT et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In a separate order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff consented to proceed in all matters in this action under the jurisdiction of a United States…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API