Legal Opinion

Renth v. Krausz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 27, 1991No. 5-90-0372PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Howerton

Buyers sued seller to rescind a real estate installment contract alleging that seller failed to attach to the contract a certificate of compliance with the building code as required by section 2 of “An Act relating to installment contracts to sell dwelling structures” (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 29, par. 8.22).

That act states in pertinent part:

“Any installment contract for the sale of a dwelling structure shall be voidable at the election of the buyer unless there is attached to the contract or incorporated therein a certificate of compliance ***.”

The seller filed a third-party complaint…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pyle v. FerrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Perlman v. First National Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. McCartney v. McCartneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Nancy's Home of Stuffed Pizza, Inc. v. CirrincioneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. McKey v. McKeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. National Underground Construction Co. v. E.A. Cox Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Christ Hospital & Medical Center v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. NAT. UNDERGROUND CONST. v. EA Cox Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Schilke v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSBDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API