Legal Opinion
Amanat v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 17, 2008No. 06-5209UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Irfan Amanat seeks review of the decision of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) finding that he willfully violated § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. We will deny the petition.
I
Because we write only for the parties, familiarity with the facts is presumed, and we include only those facts that are relevant to our analysis.
Amanat was the Chief Technology Officer for Tradescape Corp. (“Tradescape”), a securities and technology company. Tradescape was the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Michael J. MARKOWSKI, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Dolphin & Bradbury, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Monetta Financial Services, Inc. And Robert S. Bacarella v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Christopher A. Lowry v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. COLLINSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021