Legal Opinion
Straw v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.
Defendant insurance company claims it is discharged from liability by reason of the following clause in the insurance policy:
“Chattel Mortgage. Unless otherwise provided by agreement in writing added hereto, this company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any property insured hereunder while incumbered by a chattel mortgage, and during the time of such incumbrance this company shall be liable only for loss or damage to any other property insured hereunder.”
The policy in question was a standard form policy authorized to be issued in the state of Wisconsin. It is conceded that no notice…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reeves v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Moe v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Prentiss-Wabers Stove Co. v. Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Kitch v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Estreen v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. SalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Riteway Carriers, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Emmco Insurance v. Palatine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Emmco Insurance v. Palatine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953