Legal Opinion

Straw v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

Defendant insurance company claims it is discharged from liability by reason of the following clause in the insurance policy:

“Chattel Mortgage. Unless otherwise provided by agreement in writing added hereto, this company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any property insured hereunder while incumbered by a chattel mortgage, and during the time of such incumbrance this company shall be liable only for loss or damage to any other property insured hereunder.”

The policy in question was a standard form policy authorized to be issued in the state of Wisconsin. It is conceded that no notice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Moe v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Prentiss-Wabers Stove Co. v. Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Kitch v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Estreen v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. SalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Riteway Carriers, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  3. Emmco Insurance v. Palatine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Emmco Insurance v. Palatine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API