Legal Opinion

Sequeira v. Lincoln National Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2015No. A139639PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

Like most of us, Donald Sequeira (Sequeira) did not work on January 1, 2010, because it was a paid holiday. Tragically, he was hospitalized the next day with a sudden illness and died on January 6 without ever returning to work.

Sequeira’s widow sought benefits under a supplemental life insurance policy that was issued to Sequeira’s employer on January 1, 2010. The trial court ruled that she was not entitled to benefits because the policy required her husband to be “on the job, at his employer’s place of employment, performing his customary duties” between January 1 and his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Powerine Oil Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Vicente Acevedo Velez v. Crown Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Bridgestone Ams. Tire Operations, L.L.C. v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. AT&T Services, Inc. v. Max Retrans LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. v. Anthony MackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API