Legal Opinion
Bundrage v. STANDARD GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 6, 1993No. A93A1571PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
Roosevelt Bundrage appeals the grant of summary judgment to Standard Guaranty on his claim for Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits, for penalties and punitive damages under former OCGA § 33-34-6 (b), and, pursuant to his amended complaint, for penalties and attorney fees under former OCGA § 33-4-6. After Bundrage was injured in a covered accident, he received medical care from health care providers to whom he assigned the right to collect the PIP benefits. Standard Guaranty paid medical benefits up to a certain amount and then ceased payments. Thereafter,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santiago v. Safeway InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Terry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Vulcan Life Insurance v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Hyde v. KlarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Fleming v. CarasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golden Pantry Food Stores, Inc. v. Lay Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Standard Guaranty Insurance v. BundrageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Bundrage v. Standard Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Standard Guaranty Insurance v. BundrageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994