Standard Guaranty Insurance v. Bundrage
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hunstein, Justice.
We granted certiorari in this case, as respondent Roosevelt Bundrage stated in his brief before us, “to consider the effect of assignments of benefits in both tort and insurance cases.” We have recently addressed these same issues in Allianz Life Ins. Co. v. Riedl, 264 Ga. 395 (444 SE2d 736) (1994), in which a majority of this Court rejected all of the arguments Bundrage raised regarding the effect of such assignments. Bundrage now asserts that the documents he executed were not assignments but instead were powers of attorney. However, a review of the record reveals that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Irvin v. AskewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America v. RiedlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Bundrage v. STANDARD GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Howard v. DeKalb County Jail StaffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Sumner v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Witty v. McNeal Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Lowery v. Atlanta Heart Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Glean v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- In the Interest of C. A. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.