Legal Opinion · Dissent

Standard Guaranty Insurance v. Bundrage

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1994No. S94G0450Published

1DissentCarley, Justice

In this case, appellee-defendant insurer based its real party in interest defense upon appellant-plaintiff insured’s purported assignment of benefits. However, it appears that, unlike the document in Allianz Life Ins. Co. v. Riedl, 264 Ga. 395 (444 SE2d 736) (1994), the insured’s purported assignment may be a mere power of attorney. If the document is a mere power of attorney, rather than an assignment, then, as was recognized in Allianz Life Ins. Co. v. Riedl, supra at 396 (1), the insured would not be divested of the right to sue the insurer and the trial court erred in holding that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America v. RiedlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Bundrage v. STANDARD GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API