Legal Opinion
Michigan Automobile Ins. v. Van Buskirk
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1927No. 19653PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The written application for the policy of insurance expressly provided that the statements therein contained were made a part of the policy and that the assured warranted the same to he true by acceptance. Such statements therefore became a part of the contract of insurance as if fully embodied therein. Byers v. Farmers’ Ins. Co., 35 Ohio St., 606, 35 Am. Rep., 623; Hutchins v. Cleveland Mut. Ins. Co., 11 Ohio St., 477.
The policy further provided that it should be void in case the assured concealed any material fact or circumstance concerning the insurance, or if the automobile should be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bennecke v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Satz v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mark-It Place Foods, Inc. v. New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. HookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Turner Liquidating Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Everhart v. State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. MacDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.