Legal Opinion

Di Stefano v. Di Stefano

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1943No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an action in divorce brought by the husband, alleging cruel and. barbarous treatment and indignities. Testimony was. taken before a master, who, after a careful review, reeominended the divorce on the ground of indignities. The court adopted the recommendation and a final decree in divorce was entered. Eespondent appeals.

Our independent examination of the testimony com vinces us that the master correctly and fairly analyzed the evidence. It will serve no useful purpose to repeat it here. Suffice it to say, the false and totally unproven accusations of immorality, together…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Breene v. BreeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Epstein v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Secor v. SecorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Cunningham v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Martin v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Knapp v. KnappSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Bailey v. BaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API