Legal Opinion

Department of Finance v. Sheldon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1942No. 26786. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The Department of Finance began an action in the municipal court of Chicago against J. Sheldon, the appellant. The abstract filed by the appellant does not intelligibly set forth the substance of the appellee’s statement of claim or the nature of its demands; the evidence is not abstracted; and the abstract fails to set forth the amount of the judgment appealed from or to state in whose favor it was entered. The abstract contains one page. It is not indexed, nor does it refer to the pages in the record by numerals on the margin. The abstract is substantially defective.

Rule 38 (370 Ill. 43)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gyure v. Sloan Valve Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Department of Finance v. BodeIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Clinton v. Drainage Commissioners of Drainage District No. 7Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Morris v. KrejciIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Biggs v. SpaderIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bruske v. ArnoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. Harris v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hayes v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People Ex Rel. McWard v. Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API