Legal Opinion

Beaudoin v. Lenza

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 6, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order for judgment affirmed. The defendant, by an oral contract, engaged the plaintiff, a building contractor, to make certain extensive alterations on his property, payment to be made in accordance with biweekly bills computed on a cost plus basis. Upon default in payment, the plaintiff refused to continue with the work, and sues upon the same cause of action in three counts: one under G. L. c. 231, § 147, for work done and materials furnished, one under G. L. c. 231, § 7, on an account annexed, and one specifically in quantum meruit. An auditor found the identical sum to be recoverable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Monast v. BrodeurMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Ford v. BurchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joseph Scaduto v. Anthony J. Orlando, D/B/A A. J. Orlando Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Frank Fitzgerald, Inc. v. PACELLA BROTHERS, INCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  3. Besicorp Group, Inc. v. Thermo Electron Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
  4. Wolk v. TeichMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API