Legal Opinion

Monast v. Brodeur

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 25, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Decree affirmed with costs of the appeal. In June, 1948, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant Brodeur (hereinafter called the defendant) by which he agreed, at a fixed sum per house, to furnish the labor involved in the construction of several houses that the defendant was erecting. Thereafter considerable work was done by the plaintiff, but before the houses were finished the defendant terminated the agreement and engaged another contractor to complete them. One of the objects of this bill in equity — and the only one that need concern us — is to recover, on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FarrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Fitzgerald v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Dalton v. American Ammonia Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beaudoin v. LenzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Heath v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Pugliesi v. JacquotMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1959
  4. County Paint Co. v. VanceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1959
  5. Delaney v. LalliMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API