United States of America, in No. 82-1605 v. Fmc Corporation, in No. 82-1640
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
! The question whether Congress has impliedly authorized a right of action to enforce a statute raises important issues unifier the doctrine of the separation of powers. Whether the right of action is asserted by a private party or by the United States government, these issues are of equally broad import. In this case, the United States claims a right of action to sue to invalidate a patent under 35 U.S.C. § 135(c). No provision of law expressly ¶anctions such an action. It is now necessary to decide whether Congress neverthe-ljess impliedly authorized…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Of New Jersey, Department Of Environmental Protection And Energy v. Long Island Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Cts Corporation v. Piher International Corporation and Piher Sociedad AnonimaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Sierra Club v. PenaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. M/V Cape FearCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Brooks v. Johnson and Johnson, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.