Legal Opinion

Cts Corporation v. Piher International Corporation and Piher Sociedad Anonima

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 17, 1984No. Appeal 83-1119, 83-1120, 83-1146 and 83-1147PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KASHIWA, Circuit Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal from a judgment order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Nos. 72 C 1891 and 76 C 1152), entered May 25, 1983. In its oral findings of fact and conclusions of law, the district court denied, inter alia, Piher International Corporation and Piher Sociedad Anomina’s (“Piher”) Rule 60(b)(6) 1 motion to modify the district court’s judgment order entered January 25, 1982. CTS Corp. v. Piher International Corp., 219 USPQ 1180. The Rule 60(b)(6) motion was sought in order to render unenforceable the agreements…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Evans, Inc. v. Tiffany & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  5. Cinerama, Inc., a New York Corporation v. Sweet Music, S.A., a Swiss Corporation, and Union Bank of Switzerland, a Swiss CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Rohm & Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Bayer Aktiengesellschaft v. Duphar International Research B.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. And Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Keith W. Atkinson, an Individual, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API