Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Johnson and Johnson, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 10, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-2395PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs initial complaint was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs amended complaint will be dismissed in part.
Plaintiff alleges that he was given the medication Haldol by medical personnel. Haldol is allegedly manufactured by defendant McNeilab, allegedly a wholly owned subsidiary of defendant Johnson and Johnson. Plaintiff alleges that defendants deliberately “suppressed the fact that Haldol has ... approximately 350 ... serious and deadly side effects.” Plaintiff alleges that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kevin Monahan v. Dorchester Counseling Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Mele v. Hill Health CenterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Briand v. LavigneDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Carmack v. National RR Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- N.A.M.I. (National Alliance of Mentally Ill of Essex) v. Essex County Board of FreeholdersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.