Embry v. Midland Land Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, McClain County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by the Midland Land Company against A. Embry and others. Judgment for' plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
WATTS, C.
Defendant in error sued the plaintiffs in error in the district court of McClain county to recover upon a dissolving bond, by reason of the default therein, which bond was filed before a justice of the peace for the city of Purcell. The petition is usual in form, to which is attached and made a part thereof the bond mentioned (in which bond there is no obligee named) and a copy of the judgment of the justice of the peace. Plaintiffs in error demurred, showing:(1) “That the dissolving bond, subject of the action and upon which the suit is based, is null and void and of no…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Huffman v. KoppelkomNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- County of Bay ex rel. Houghtaling v. BrockMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Harrison v. Masonic Mutual Benefit SocietySupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Washburn v. DelaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waldrep v. Exchange State Bank of KeiferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Witham v. GageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hanson v. District Court of Third Judicial District in & for Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1943