County of Bay ex rel. Houghtaling v. Brock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This is an action upon the official bond of Martin W. Brock, late sheriff of Bay county, brought by Houghtaling and Komeyn, who allege as their injury, the neglect to levy an execution issued to him upon a judgment in their favor, and a false return thereon.
The case in the court below turned upon the validity of the bond, which unfortunately had not been framed in conformity to the statute. The statute requires the bond to be given to the people of the State in the penal sum of ten thousand dollars, with condition that if the principal obligor shall well and faithfully in all things perform…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Raynsford v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Van Deusen v. NewcomerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Inhabitants of Montville v. HaughtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
- People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by24 opinions
- Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. HulbertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- Buhrer v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Board of Commissioners v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Thompson v. Grider Implement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.