Legal Opinion

Fine v. Navarre

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Monroe. (Kinne, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are ■stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment -rendered against him in the circuit court in an action for malicious prosecution. The defendant had made a complaint against the plaintiff for violation of the liquor law, the charge being that he was engaged in the business of selling, etc., spirituous and intoxicating liquors without having paid the tax of $500, and without having posted the receipt and notice required by law, which resulted in bis acquittal upon the trial at the circuit. This action was Ihen brought.

The counsel for defendant requested the circuit judge to instruct the jury that there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. Town of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  2. Burt v. McBainMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Huntington v. GaultMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Harris v. WoodfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hatt v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Birdsall v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. LaLone v. RashidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Adkin v. PillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Taft v. J L Hudson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API