Legal Opinion

Taft v. J L Hudson Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1972No. Docket 10788PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Valkenburg, J.

This is a malicious prosecution action. At about 9 p.m. on October 8, 1965, plaintiffs went to the J. L. Hudson department store located at Westland Mall in Wayne County with the intent to pick up plaintiff Taft’s wife, who worked at that store. As plaintiffs entered the store they were approached by two men who indicated that the store was closed or was about to be closed. Plaintiff Cut-lip remained at the door while Taft went in search of his wife.

After Taft had proceeded about 50 feet into the store, he was met by defendant Bourgeous, who was in charge of security for the store. Bourgeous…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kroll v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Belt v. RitterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Belt v. RitterMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Savage v. Peterson Distributing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pauley v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Kujawski v. CohenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Rivers v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API