Labalokie v. Capital Area Intermediate Unit
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, Chief Judge.
Before the court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The motion has been briefed by both parties and is ripe for disposition.
Background
Plaintiff in this action is Michael P. Labalokie, and Defendants are Capitol Area Intermediate Unit (“CAIU”), John Nagle and Edward Frye. For purposes of this motion, the court accepts as true the following factual averments in Plaintiffs Complaint. CAIU is a unit of the state public education system which provides a variety of services to member districts, including the transportation of special education students, which is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hennessy v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Fioriglio v. City of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Whaumbush v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Reis v. BARLEY, SNYDER, SENFT & COHEN LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Martin v. FinleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.