Legal Opinion

Bayuk Bros. Inc. v. Wilson Martin Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1922No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The plaintiff seeks in this action to recover for injuries to its automobile which came into collision with a motor truck of the defendant, which had been left standing, without a light, in the traveled part of a public highway in the State of New Jersey. The collision occurred on November 19,1920. Witnesses for the plaintiff testified that it occurred at 6:30 o’clock in the evening, when it had for some time been dark, while the employee of the defendant in charge of the truck testified that it happened at half past four o’clock, when it was still light. The court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Musser v. StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Jaras v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Bollinger v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Cormican v. MenkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Gaber Et Ux. v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Personal Finance Co. of New York v. General Finance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API