Legal Opinion

Paschen v. Lovett

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1923No. 472-3854PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerman, J.

Although in the beginning there were numerous parties to this suit, at the present time there are but two parties, T. P. Lovett, who will be called plaintiff, and W. E. Paschen, who will be called defendant. The suit originated in Cameron county, Tex., and was brought by Lovett to enforce the payment of certain notes and to foreclose a vendor’s lien on lands for which they were executed. The notes were dated April 1, 1913, and were executed by Ralph R. Langley in favor of John Closner and W. F. Sprague. On that date Closner and Sprague executed a deed to Ralph R. Langley conveying certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Reeves and Lester v. McCrackenTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Shepard v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ansley Realty Co. v. Pope & SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Scale v. TompkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation Co. v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Seimer v. James Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1924
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Noblitt v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Warren v. La Salle Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API