Legal Opinion

Reeves and Lester v. McCracken

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1910No. 2073PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Deaf Smith County. Beeves and Lester obtained writ of error on a judgment affirming a recovery against them and others at suit of Mrs. McCracken.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

Reeves and Lester, plaintiffs in error, are the only parties complaining in this court of a judgment recovered in the District Court -and affirmed in the Court of Civil Appeals by Mrs. Rhoda McCracken, defendant in error, against them and also against C. E. Edwards and W. H. Raysor. The action was brought by Mrs. McCracken for the rescission of a contract of purchase and sale in which Reeves and Lester had, on September 23, 1906, conveyed to her a section of land, on account of. fraud practiced on her by Edwards and Raysor, alleged to have acted as agents of Reeves and Lester, to induce her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. BlanchardTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Thompson v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. American National Bank v. CrugerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pendarvis v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Saigh v. Monteith, C.J.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Stout v. OliveiraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. American Indemnity Co. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lockhart, State Tr. v. A.W. Snyder Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ferguson v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API