Legal Opinion

Moran v. Nafi Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1963No. Calendar 47, Docket 49,693PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

On February 25, 1960, this Court in a 4-to-3 decision with 1 Justice not participating, *537changed the law of onr State in order to permit a wife to bring a separate action for loss of consortium. Montgomery v. Stephan, 359 Mich 33. Whatever our view now as to the correctness of the judicial pronouncement in Montgomery relating to the existence of the cause of action, it stands, at least for the present, as to the circuit bench of our State, the controlling law, and loss of consortium is actionable if properly asserted.

On April 21, 1961, plaintiff wife, in the instant case, filed her declaration…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Wall v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Jordan v. CA Roberts CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Burgess v. Holloway Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Hesse v. Ashland Oil, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Nichols v. Benco Plastics, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API