Legal Opinion
Rixon Inc. v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 2, 1982No. Civ. A. 78-18PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, District Judge:
Rixon, Inc. here seeks a declaratory judgment that certain United States patents held by Racal-Milgo, Inc. (“Milgo”) are invalid, unenforceable and uninfringed. Mil-go has counterclaimed for relief against alleged infringements by Rixon, Inc. For present purposes our focus is on three patents — No. 3,524,023 (“Whang ’023”), issued to Sang Whang; No. 3,643,023 (“Payne ’023”), issued to Paul Payne and Robert Ragsdale; and No. 3,590,381 (“Rags-dale ’381”) issued to Robert Ragsdale. All involve electronic circuits used in devices known as “modems.”
A modem, short…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rose Hall, Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Overseas Banking Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Pollack v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Monument Record Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Brotech Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- United Business Communications, Inc. v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- Revlon, Inc. v. Carson Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.